arabian: (I ♥ RTD)
arabian ([personal profile] arabian) wrote2008-08-23 09:55 am

Yup, they were doing it ...

So, I've been convinced for a while now that the Doctor and Rose were definitely having sex in S2. (I even wrote a post up that referenced a few of my points behind the cut, but I was asking other opinions, I wasn't convinced myself. Now I am.) I know, I know ... it's Doctor Who, that doesn't happen on Who, or I know, I know ... the way they kissed in "Journey's End" proved that it hadn't happened before. Well, as for the latter, there's a perfectly reasonable explanation to that kiss that still makes the theory that they were going at it like bunnies work. As for it being Who, that's why it's kinda there in between the lines, because it's technically a "kid's show" and there are purists who don't want to go there. But there are definitely signs that point to that kind of relationship between them.

I think their relationship changed and became physically intimate after (big shock here!) "The Impossible Planet/The Satan Pit." What they went through in that episode, before and after the separation, brought them to a new level, I think. First the "stuck with you" conversation. Yes, they were a little awkward and not quite saying what they meant, but it was obvious what was at the heart of their dialogue, and both were clearly thinking in the same direction. For Rose, it's not that big a leap that she could deal with them being stuck in one place, but the fact that the Doctor wasn't freaking out, but came across as in almost the same place as she? That was a huge sign, that as much as he loves the TARDIS and his life as a Time Traveler, being with Rose is enough that he's willing to even contemplate it.

After the separation, we had the first time the Doctor said "I love you," without saying it and then claimed belief in her over any and everything in the entire universe. For Rose, we had her insistence in not leaving, even if he was gone. She didn't care; she wanted to be wherever he was, even if it was just the memory of the last place he'd been. Emotionally, they both took giant leaps here, so a sexual relationship coming off the heels of that two-parter makes perfect sense. And after that episode, these are the little moments we got that led me to believe that, yes, they DID take that step.

- In "Fear Her," a small (if disgusting) thing, true, but the fact that (a) the Doctor casually, calmly holds out his hand, casually and calmly *expecting* Rose to spit chewed up gum into his hand, and (b) that Rose casually and calmly spits said chewed up gum into his hand. I mean, come on? Yes, they are very close. They are, but I couldn't imagine Donna doing that unless she really, really, really, REALLY had to ... and in this case, Rose didn't even have to one "really" have to do it. Yet, it was just a casual intimate moment between them that bespoke of her saliva being on his body not an uncommon occurrence.

- Cheating a bit, I know as it was a deleted scene, but in "Army of Ghosts," as the Doctor and Rose head towards Powell Estate (I assume), they simply hold hands. No rush, no emergency, no danger, no running from or towards danger. They're just two people in love walking along ... holding hands. I know that doesn't say "THEY ARE HAVING SEX!!!OMG!!!!," but tied in with everything else and the fact that it's such a casual, comfortable thing adds to the whole theory.

- One of the biggies ... "Doomsday." Anyone reading this knows exactly where I'm going here.
    Doctor: You've still got Mr. Mickey, then?
    Rose: There's five of us now. Mum, dad, Mickey ... and the baby.
    Doctor: (Slightly stunned) You're not ...?
    Rose: No. (Laughing) It's mum.
I mean, come on ... It was totally leading there. The Doctor's reaction, his expression, tone of voice to "you're not ..." and Rose's long look back at him with the slight smile before the laughing "no." I'm certainly not one for the whole idea of a bunch of Timetots running around, and pretty much avoid babyfic!, but the idea that the Doctor would think ...

Of course, there's another interpretation as the comment came on the heels of "Well, you've still got Mr. Mickey then," but I can't imagine that a few weeks after he and Rose are cruelly separated that he would (a) automatically assume that she got it on with Mickey (or any other guy), (b) not be more than stunned, but rather peeved, annoyed, jealous, etc. This *IS* the Doctor about ROSE!.

So, no, I don't buy that he thought it was Mickey's. That would have garnered a different reaction from the Doctor, indeed. Instead, we got one of slightly being stunned and vaguely wistful response to Rose then giving him that look, before laughing. The dialogue and reactions from both the Doctor and Rose are too telling, in my opinion. And the fact that quite a few people did wonder if it was implying what they thought they possibly couldn't be implying ... which tells me it's quite likely that Rusty was cackling his evil laugh somewhere in glee knowing that people were thinking it. AND being the total Doctor/Rose OTP-shipper that he is, I can't help but think that he *did* intend for people to think that, knowing that they'd dismiss it because it's Who.

- Rose's top in the TARDIS console room in "The Runaway Bride." Yes, the point was that it was supposed to show Donna that there had been another female there giving rise to her kidnapping women fear, and keep the Dotor's angst alive and kicking. But ... her top? Why not a hoodie, or a brush, or some other female accoutrement that didn't scream, 'Hi! I undress in the TARDIS console room where the Doctor and I shag like bunnies!' Okay, okay, fine it doesn't scream that ... BUT, her top?!?! You don't leave your top casually slung about (other than in your bedroom) when you live with someone you don't have an intimate relationship with. So why would Rose's TOP be casually laying about the console room like that unless either she or the Doctor had pulled it off before shagging like bunnies?!?!?! See, just another small piece that fits.

- The choice of phrase the Doctor describes his relationship with Rose as to Martha in "Smith and Jones" when she asks him about who he travels with. It starts out described in a removed fashion as "guests" before rambling into a much more intimate comment about Rose specifically.
    Martha: Is there a crew, like a navigator and stuff? Where is everyone?
    Doctor: Just me.
    Martha: All on your own?
    Doctor: Well, sometimes I have guests. I mean, some friends traveling alongside me. I had ... it was recently ... a friend of mine. Rose, her name was. Rose ... and ... we were together.
So we go from "guests" to "friends traveling alongside me," to "a friend of mine," to specifically naming her "Rose." Before we finally get to "and ... we were together." Be honest ... if this were not Doctor Who, just a normal, non-sci-fi, non-cracky, non-"children's show" kind of program, or a book, or someone in real life and they described a relationship with someone as "we were together," the assumption that everyone and their dog would take from that phrase would be that they were together ... in the biblical sense. They were a couple, an item, shagging like bunnies.

- Which brings us to "Turn Left" ... we have Rose's reaction to Donna's: "Were you and him ...?" which while wasn't a ringing cry of 'hell yeah!,' neither was it a denial. At all. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that it actually leaned more in the direction of 'yes, we were' as opposed to 'no, it wasn't like that.' If they WEREN'T together (hah! I wasn't even thinking of the above paragraph, but merely trying to come up with another way of saying 'weren't shagging like bunnies,' and my brain automatically filled in "weren't together" -- see!?!?!?), why didn't Rose just do the slight head shake, laugh, look-down in slight wistful, 'no' sigh that would have easily, no ambiguity there, answer that question? You know why? BECAUSE THEY WERE! Uh huh.

It should be noted that of all of the episodes I referenced above to "prove" my theory, all but "Fear Her" was written by Russell T. Davies. Uh huh.

Finally, back to the kiss in "Journey's End," that kiss coming like it did didn't necessarily mean that they hadn't been, well, you know, and thus the surprise and shock of her pulling him to her like that. Simply it implied that the Doctor had never said the words before -- which really wouldn't come as a surprise from Mr. Euphemism-boy ("Does it need saying?" *Oh, Doctor*). After all, they went right into each other's arms, kissing away like they'd had practice -- and it'd been a really long time since Cassandra, and it was, well, Cassandra! so I'm not counting it.

So, unless we are somehow proven elsewise through canon -- though, how that would ever come up now?? -- all of the above signs, along with their general air about each other, says to me that they were indeed "together," shagging like bunnies, pick your euphemism and nothing in canon disputes that belief if you're not inclined against it. Which I'm not.
ext_1774: butterfly against blue background (Default)

*agrees very much*

[identity profile] butterfly.livejournal.com 2008-08-23 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Post-TIP/TSP is exactly where they start sleeping together in my personal canon, too. Their emotional intimacy gets even closer after that episode and... yeah... there's the baby pause of "You're not...?" that kinda seals it for me. His voice is so soft and wistful there.

*pets the Doctor, who so totally wants to have a little baby girl with Rose's smile*

I mean, even DWM thought that they'd at least been making out before "Doomsday" (they called her kissing Ten II in JE a way to compare and see that it was really the Doctor).

Re: *agrees very much*

[identity profile] arabian.livejournal.com 2008-08-23 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Their emotional intimacy gets even closer after that episode and... yeah... there's the baby pause of "You're not...?" that kinda seals it for me. His voice is so soft and wistful there.

*pets the Doctor, who so totally wants to have a little baby girl with Rose's smile*


There's just a change. I mean, even in the little bits of "Love & Monsters" I just get this sentence that they are more a "family" than ever before.

I mean, even DWM thought that they'd at least been making out before "Doomsday"

Hee, I know, I LOVED that! Though, I don't know, how much insight does DWM have, or is just basically a fan magazine that has access to interview them or do you think they had info from those involved to say that definitively?

Re: *agrees very much*

[identity profile] firefaery2.livejournal.com 2008-08-23 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd say DWM is the closest you'd come to 'official' where a magazine is concerned. Having kept the show alive when it wasn't on TV, it's become very much a part of DW as a whole, and it's allowed access to areas of production where something that was totally 'fan-based' would not be.

Any news reported in DWM is guaranteed to be truthful, and interviews with cast and crew aren't messed about with, because it is so much a part of the show and it's fan-base. RTD even has his own column! However, I don't think that this means we should assume that every comment made in DWM can be relied upon to answer questions about the show, such as questions about the nature of the Doctor/Rose relationship.

Of course, it also depends on what you consider 'proof' that their relationship was sexual. It's never been stated in canon (obviously, being a kid's show) but I think it's been hinted at. What really matters is what we make of it, because we are the fans and this show is for us. They're fictional characters, and so nothing REALLY happened... and fiction is limitless... isn't it wonderful? :D If we say it happened, it did, and they're not contradicting us, are they?

Now, if what you really want to know is whether the makers themselves believe the Doctor and Rose 'had' a sexual relationship, they've always been pretty ambiguous. While everyone seems to agree that Doctor/Rose was a love story (and their love is definate canon from Doomsday), David Tennant said he was sure there was 'no shagging in the TARDIS', Billie Piper called the Doctor 'the love of [Rose's] life' etc. Julie Gardener seems to think the two have always had romantic feelings for each other, while RTD likes to dance around the subject. So I think most of the cast/crew are certain that the Doctor/Rose love was of a romantic nature... whether it was sexual or not is another matter.

Personally, I'm not one for the idea of the Doctor and Rose shagging during season 2, although I definately agree that their relationship became more intimate after IP/SP (if that was possible...). This is mainly because I like the idea of this epic, tragic love-story, where they were both so in love but couldn't/didn't act on it. I think it makes 'Journey's End' beautiful, if tragic, because the Doctor is giving Rose something he could never give her as a Time Lord. I don't doubt that they were crazily in love (as friends and potential lovers), but I think they ran out of time, and their relationship never had a chance to become what they (especially Rose, I think) wanted it to be.

Re: *agrees very much*

[identity profile] arabian.livejournal.com 2008-08-23 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd say DWM is the closest you'd come to 'official' where a magazine is concerned. Having kept the show alive when it wasn't on TV, it's become very much a part of DW as a whole, and it's allowed access to areas of production where something that was totally 'fan-based' would not be.

Ooh, that's lovely to know!! Hee, then it makes me even more convinced that my theory is correct.

However, I don't think that this means we should assume that every comment made in DWM can be relied upon to answer questions about the show, such as questions about the nature of the Doctor/Rose relationship.

Aww, you're no fun. ::pouts::

Of course, it also depends on what you consider 'proof' that their relationship was sexual. It's never been stated in canon (obviously, being a kid's show) but I think it's been hinted at.

Right, it's sooooooo been hinted at.

If we say it happened, it did, and they're not contradicting us, are they?

And that's my main point, really, they are NOT contradicting that belief.

I think it makes 'Journey's End' beautiful, if tragic, because the Doctor is giving Rose something he could never give her as a Time Lord.

Someone asked below (and I do want to respond to that), but I don't think it was sex that the Doctor was thinking of, I never have. It was more the possibility of settling down, the white picket fence, and even more so, the ability to grow old together, spend *their* lives together. But maybe that's just me.